Skip to main content

Trump’s Thanksgiving Lie? Is the 25% ‘Savings’ Built on Smoke and Mirrors ?

Trump’s Thanksgiving Lie? Is the 25% ‘Savings’ Built on Smoke and Mirrors?

Trump’s Thanksgiving Lie? Is the 25% ‘Savings’ Built on Smoke and Mirrors?

Three days after the original claim—and just in time for holiday prep—here’s what’s really on the menu.

On November 7 and 8, 2025, Donald Trump repeated a rosy economic promise to voters: “Thanksgiving this year will cost 25% less than last year,” he declared, pointing to Walmart’s promotional meal basket as proof.

It sounds like good news. But it’s not true—not in any meaningful way.

Yes, Walmart’s 2025 basket is priced about 25% lower than its 2024 version. But that’s only because the 2025 basket contains fewer items, smaller portions, and cheaper substitutes. In short: it’s not the same meal. It’s a bait-and-switch dressed up as generosity—as the Associated Press fact check confirms.

The Walmart Supercenter store on Richmond Avenue in Staunton, Virginia

The Walmart Supercenter on Richmond Avenue in Staunton, Virginia. Photo by Ben Schumin. Used under CC BY-SA 2.0.

The Basket Bait-and-Switch

Last year, Walmart’s Thanksgiving basket included 11 items: a whole turkey, Green Giant stuffing, Ocean Spray cranberry sauce, Libby’s pumpkin pie filling, Pillsbury rolls, and more—for about $54.

This year? Eight items: a smaller, generic-brand turkey, no dinner rolls, no pie filling, and Great Value substitutes throughout. Total price: ~$41.

That’s a 24–25% drop in cost—but a 27% drop in content. Walmart never pretended otherwise. But Trump did.

What the Data Actually Says

According to the American Farm Bureau Federation’s annual Thanksgiving Cost Survey—the gold standard for holiday price tracking—the average cost of a classic Thanksgiving dinner for 10 people rose to $65.87 in 2025, up from $64.05 in 2024.

Meanwhile, a Wells Fargo analysis confirms many grocery staples remain elevated compared to pre-pandemic norms. And while some retailers locked in turkey prices early, that’s a function of corporate strategy—not presidential policy.

“It’s not apples to apples,” said David Anderson, livestock economist at Texas A&M University. “What this highlights is individual retailers’ strategies for getting customers in the door.”

The Politics of Pretend Relief

Trump’s claim isn’t just misleading—it’s a deliberate distraction. At a time when real wages stagnate and working families juggle rent, childcare, and grocery bills, a fabricated 25% “savings” offers emotional comfort without material change.

This is what political theater looks like when policy fails: cherry-picked data, repackaged as hope.

This fact-based analysis was reported by Comrade KAS for The Comrade Courant on November 10, 2025. All views are the author’s own.

Image credit: “Walmart in Staunton, Virginia” by Ben Schumin (Montgomery Village, Maryland, USA) is licensed under CC BY-SA 2.0. View original.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What's Really Happening in Portland? Trump Threatens Military Crackdown as ICE Faces Permit Revocation

What's Really Happening in Portland? Trump Threatens Military Crackdown as ICE Faces Permit Revocation Federal troop deployment threatens Portland as the city moves to hold ICE accountable for permit violations, creating a dangerous spectacle of political theater. PORTLAND, OR – On September 27th, Donald Trump declared on Truth Social that he was directing "all necessary Troops to protect War ravaged Portland," framing the city as a battlefield against "Antifa, and other domestic terrorists" . This announcement was followed by a Defense Department memo placing 200 members of the Oregon National Guard under federal control for up to 60 days, a move state leaders are challenging in court . Governor Tina Kotek, who had refused to mobilize the Guard herself, stated, "Oregon is our home — not a military target" . The reality on the ground contradicts the administration's narrative. Mayor Keith Wilson asserted that "the number of neces...

What Is a Tankie—and Why You Don’t Want to Be One

What Is a Tankie—and Why You Don’t Want to Be One On authoritarianism, anti-imperialism, and the betrayal of socialist principles In leftist discourse, few terms carry as much heat as “tankie.” It’s hurled in online arguments, whispered in organizing meetings, and increasingly invoked to describe a certain strain of pro-authoritarian “leftism” that defends dictators under the banner of anti-imperialism. But the term isn’t just internet slang. It has a precise historical origin—and a political meaning that every socialist should understand. “Maximum Tankie” by Red & Black Salamander (9mmballpoint.blogspot.com). Used under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. The Origin of the Term The word “tankie” emerged in 1956, when Soviet tanks rolled into Budapest to crush the Hungarian Revolution—a popular uprising of workers and students demanding democratic socialism. Members of the Communist Party of Great Britain who defended this violent suppression were derisively ...

The Emperor’s New Magnets

The Emperor’s New Magnets Trump’s wet physics and the theater of power Aboard the USS George Washington this week, Donald Trump—rambling incoherently—revived a claim he first made at an Iowa rally in January 2024: that water disables magnets. “Give me a glass of water,” he said then, “drop it on the magnets—that’s the end of the magnets.” Now, he’s using that same myth to argue that U.S. aircraft carriers should abandon electromagnetic catapults and elevators in favor of steam and hydraulics. Never mind that the Navy’s Electromagnetic Aircraft Launch System (EMALS) operates flawlessly in rain, salt spray, and full oceanic conditions. Never mind that magnets do not stop working when wet —a fact confirmed by centuries of physics and every refrigerator on Earth. This isn’t a gaffe. It’s a worldview. Desi Lydic eviscerates Trump’s “wet magnets” claim on The Daily Show (November 2025). “Do You F–k With Magnets?” On Tuesday’s Daily Show , hos...