Skip to main content

Ballot Brouhaha: How Basic Voting Rules Became 'Evidence' of Fraud

Ballot Brouhaha: How Basic Voting Rules Became 'Evidence' of Fraud

Ballot Brouhaha: How Basic Voting Rules Became 'Evidence' of Fraud

When social media magnates and election skeptics scrutinized New York City's ballots, they mistook voting laws for conspiracy—and exposed a dangerous pattern of disinformation.

On November 4, 2025, as New Yorkers lined up to vote in their mayoral election, billionaire X owner Elon Musk took to his platform with an alarming declaration: "The New York City ballot form is a scam!" He pointed to candidates appearing twice on ballots and former Governor Andrew Cuomo's placement at the bottom as undeniable proof of election rigging.

It sounded convincing to his millions of followers. But it wasn't true—not in any meaningful way.

Vote NYC. Vote Here sign at a polling location

"Vote NYC. Vote Here" sign at a polling location. Photo by Oleg Yunakov, November 7, 2023. Licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0.

The Fusion Voting Reality

What Musk and others dismissed as "scam" is actually a legal practice called fusion voting—a system enshrined in New York law since the mid-20th century. Under this system, candidates can appear on the ballot multiple times if nominated by different political parties.

This year, Democratic nominee Zohran Mamdani appeared twice—once as the Democratic candidate and once as the Working Families Party nominee. Republican Curtis Sliwa similarly appeared as both the Republican candidate and the "Protect Animals" party candidate.

"This occurs pretty frequently and it enables the Democratic candidate to get the votes of people who don't normally vote for Democrats and Republicans to get the vote of people who don't vote Republican etc.," explained Richard Briffault, an election law expert and professor at Columbia Law School. New York is one of only a handful of states where fusion voting remains legal and commonly used.

Why Cuomo Landed at the Bottom

As for Andrew Cuomo's placement at the bottom of the ballot—that too followed established rules, not rigging. Cuomo, who lost the Democratic primary to Mamdani in June, created his own independent party called "Fight and Deliver" to continue his campaign.

Under New York state law, recognized political parties (Democratic, Republican, Conservative, and Working Families) appear first on ballots, in order of their performance in the previous gubernatorial election. Independent parties like Cuomo's appear below them, ordered by when they filed their nominating petitions.

"In the case of the New York City Board of Elections, this is determined by the date and time stamp when the independent nominating petition was filed with that board," explained Kathleen McGrath, a spokesperson for the New York State Board of Elections. Cuomo's party was the fourth of five independent parties to submit petitions, landing him in the eighth position.

"Cuomo is only listed once because he was only nominated once, and he is low in the order because no recognized political party nominated him," said Mark Lindeman of Verified Voting. "Surely Elon Musk has people who could have looked this up for him."

The Disinformation Playbook

This isn't the first time legitimate election procedures have been weaponized as "evidence" of fraud. From ballot drop boxes to mail-in voting rules, technical aspects of election administration have consistently become targets for those seeking to undermine confidence in democratic processes.

What's particularly troubling about the NYC ballot controversy is how easily debunked it was. The rules governing ballot design are public, longstanding, and clearly explained on the Board of Elections website. Yet within hours of polls opening, false claims were amplified to millions.

This pattern—where basic election mechanics are portrayed as nefarious plots—does far more damage to our democracy than any hypothetical ballot manipulation ever could. When citizens are taught to see routine procedures as evidence of conspiracy, the very foundation of electoral legitimacy erodes.

As one veteran New York election official put it off the record: "We follow the same rules every election cycle. The only thing that's changed is how willing powerful people are to deliberately misinterpret those rules for political gain."

Protecting Democracy Through Education

Election officials nationwide emphasize that voter education is the strongest defense against disinformation. The New York City Board of Elections offers public workshops explaining ballot design and voting procedures well before each election cycle. Similar programs exist in counties across America, though they often lack sufficient funding and media attention.

"The solution isn't just debunking false claims after they spread," says Lawrence Norden, Senior Director of Election Reform at the Brennan Center for Justice. "It's proactively teaching voters how elections actually work. Most Americans don't know the intricate rules governing ballots because they've never needed to—until now."

For concerned citizens wanting to verify election information, experts recommend consulting official county or state election websites directly rather than relying on social media posts—even from influential figures. Organizations like the National Conference of State Legislatures and the U.S. Election Assistance Commission provide nonpartisan explanations of voting systems and rules by state.

This fact-based analysis was reported by Comrade KAS for The Comrade Courant on November 12, 2025. All views are the author's own.

Image credit: "Vote NYC. Vote Here" by Oleg Yunakov is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What's Really Happening in Portland? Trump Threatens Military Crackdown as ICE Faces Permit Revocation

What's Really Happening in Portland? Trump Threatens Military Crackdown as ICE Faces Permit Revocation Federal troop deployment threatens Portland as the city moves to hold ICE accountable for permit violations, creating a dangerous spectacle of political theater. PORTLAND, OR – On September 27th, Donald Trump declared on Truth Social that he was directing "all necessary Troops to protect War ravaged Portland," framing the city as a battlefield against "Antifa, and other domestic terrorists" . This announcement was followed by a Defense Department memo placing 200 members of the Oregon National Guard under federal control for up to 60 days, a move state leaders are challenging in court . Governor Tina Kotek, who had refused to mobilize the Guard herself, stated, "Oregon is our home — not a military target" . The reality on the ground contradicts the administration's narrative. Mayor Keith Wilson asserted that "the number of neces...

What Is a Tankie—and Why You Don’t Want to Be One

What Is a Tankie—and Why You Don’t Want to Be One On authoritarianism, anti-imperialism, and the betrayal of socialist principles In leftist discourse, few terms carry as much heat as “tankie.” It’s hurled in online arguments, whispered in organizing meetings, and increasingly invoked to describe a certain strain of pro-authoritarian “leftism” that defends dictators under the banner of anti-imperialism. But the term isn’t just internet slang. It has a precise historical origin—and a political meaning that every socialist should understand. “Maximum Tankie” by Red & Black Salamander (9mmballpoint.blogspot.com). Used under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. The Origin of the Term The word “tankie” emerged in 1956, when Soviet tanks rolled into Budapest to crush the Hungarian Revolution—a popular uprising of workers and students demanding democratic socialism. Members of the Communist Party of Great Britain who defended this violent suppression were derisively ...

The Emperor’s New Magnets

The Emperor’s New Magnets Trump’s wet physics and the theater of power Aboard the USS George Washington this week, Donald Trump—rambling incoherently—revived a claim he first made at an Iowa rally in January 2024: that water disables magnets. “Give me a glass of water,” he said then, “drop it on the magnets—that’s the end of the magnets.” Now, he’s using that same myth to argue that U.S. aircraft carriers should abandon electromagnetic catapults and elevators in favor of steam and hydraulics. Never mind that the Navy’s Electromagnetic Aircraft Launch System (EMALS) operates flawlessly in rain, salt spray, and full oceanic conditions. Never mind that magnets do not stop working when wet —a fact confirmed by centuries of physics and every refrigerator on Earth. This isn’t a gaffe. It’s a worldview. Desi Lydic eviscerates Trump’s “wet magnets” claim on The Daily Show (November 2025). “Do You F–k With Magnets?” On Tuesday’s Daily Show , hos...