Skip to main content

Solidarity in the Face of Hate: Manchester Attack a Symptom of a Failing System

Solidarity in the Face of Hate: Manchester Attack a Symptom of a Failing System

Why socialist solidarity, not empty rhetoric, is the true answer to antisemitic violence
Published: October 3, 2025 | Category: Analysis & Commentary

The violent attack on a synagogue in the heart of Manchester this past Friday has sent shockwaves through the community, leaving a nation grappling with a familiar and ugly spectre. As socialists, we condemn this act of antisemitic terror in the strongest possible terms. An attack on a house of worship, on people gathered in peace, is an attack on the very notion of community and solidarity we strive to build.

According to reports from the scene, a 42-year-old man armed with a makeshift weapon stormed the synagogue during a service, stabbing a man in his seventies and a police officer who responded with immense bravery. The swift intervention of these officers undoubtedly prevented a greater tragedy. The assailant, who eyewitnesses say shouted antisemitic slurs, was shot and killed at the scene.

"The fight against antisemitism is not a secondary issue for the socialist movement; it is central to our cause."

In the immediate aftermath, the bourgeois press and political establishment have rushed to frame this as an isolated act of a lone, deranged individual. They speak of "senseless violence" and offer hollow condemnations, all while continuing to pursue the very policies that create the fertile ground for such hatred to grow.

We must see this attack for what it is: not an anomaly, but a symptom. It is a symptom of a capitalist system in decay, which, in its crisis, fosters the scapegoating of minorities to divert the anger of the working class away from the true exploiters—the capitalist class. The ruling class has long used divide-and-rule tactics, pitting worker against worker, immigrant against native, Gentile against Jew, to maintain its power.

The fight against antisemitism is not a secondary issue for the socialist movement; it is central to our cause. As the great revolutionary socialist Rosa Luxemburg, herself a victim of antisemitic reaction, understood, the struggle for liberation is indivisible. An injury to one is an injury to all. To attack Jewish people is to attack the working class itself, weakened and fractured by bigotry.

We must be clear: our opposition to the far-right, racist policies of the Israeli state is not, and never will be, an excuse for hatred against Jewish people. We draw a firm and unyielding line between the critique of a state and the bigotry directed at a people. The conflation of the two is a tool used by both the far-right and apologists for imperialism to silence legitimate criticism and to justify vile prejudice.

The true response to this attack cannot be found in increased police surveillance or the empty rhetoric of politicians who have allowed community services to be slashed and social bonds to fray. The true response must be built from the ground up, through working-class solidarity.

We stand in solidarity with the Jewish community of Manchester and with all communities targeted by the poison of fascism and racism. We call for the labour movement, trade unions, and community organizations to take the lead in organizing joint defense committees and public demonstrations of unity. Let us meet the hateful actions of a few with the collective strength of the many.

The capitalists and their political agents have no real solution to the hatred they help to breed. Only we, the working class, united across ethnic and religious lines in our common struggle for a better world, can offer a future free from such fear. Our message is simple: an attack on one of us is an attack on all of us. Solidarity forever.

Manchester Antisemitism Socialist Response Working Class Solidarity Community Defense

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What's Really Happening in Portland? Trump Threatens Military Crackdown as ICE Faces Permit Revocation

What's Really Happening in Portland? Trump Threatens Military Crackdown as ICE Faces Permit Revocation Federal troop deployment threatens Portland as the city moves to hold ICE accountable for permit violations, creating a dangerous spectacle of political theater. PORTLAND, OR – On September 27th, Donald Trump declared on Truth Social that he was directing "all necessary Troops to protect War ravaged Portland," framing the city as a battlefield against "Antifa, and other domestic terrorists" . This announcement was followed by a Defense Department memo placing 200 members of the Oregon National Guard under federal control for up to 60 days, a move state leaders are challenging in court . Governor Tina Kotek, who had refused to mobilize the Guard herself, stated, "Oregon is our home — not a military target" . The reality on the ground contradicts the administration's narrative. Mayor Keith Wilson asserted that "the number of neces...

What Is a Tankie—and Why You Don’t Want to Be One

What Is a Tankie—and Why You Don’t Want to Be One On authoritarianism, anti-imperialism, and the betrayal of socialist principles In leftist discourse, few terms carry as much heat as “tankie.” It’s hurled in online arguments, whispered in organizing meetings, and increasingly invoked to describe a certain strain of pro-authoritarian “leftism” that defends dictators under the banner of anti-imperialism. But the term isn’t just internet slang. It has a precise historical origin—and a political meaning that every socialist should understand. “Maximum Tankie” by Red & Black Salamander (9mmballpoint.blogspot.com). Used under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. The Origin of the Term The word “tankie” emerged in 1956, when Soviet tanks rolled into Budapest to crush the Hungarian Revolution—a popular uprising of workers and students demanding democratic socialism. Members of the Communist Party of Great Britain who defended this violent suppression were derisively ...

The Emperor’s New Magnets

The Emperor’s New Magnets Trump’s wet physics and the theater of power Aboard the USS George Washington this week, Donald Trump—rambling incoherently—revived a claim he first made at an Iowa rally in January 2024: that water disables magnets. “Give me a glass of water,” he said then, “drop it on the magnets—that’s the end of the magnets.” Now, he’s using that same myth to argue that U.S. aircraft carriers should abandon electromagnetic catapults and elevators in favor of steam and hydraulics. Never mind that the Navy’s Electromagnetic Aircraft Launch System (EMALS) operates flawlessly in rain, salt spray, and full oceanic conditions. Never mind that magnets do not stop working when wet —a fact confirmed by centuries of physics and every refrigerator on Earth. This isn’t a gaffe. It’s a worldview. Desi Lydic eviscerates Trump’s “wet magnets” claim on The Daily Show (November 2025). “Do You F–k With Magnets?” On Tuesday’s Daily Show , hos...