Skip to main content

Assata Shakur's Life: A Look Beyond the Bounty

Beyond the Bounty: 5 Revolutionary Truths from the Life of Assata Shakur

15 min read June 12, 2023
Assata Shakur in Cuba waving a Cuban flag
Assata Shakur in Cuba waving a Cuban flag

The news of Assata Shakur's death in Cuba was met with the same polarized narrative that defined her life. To the U.S. government, she was Joanne Chesimard, a convicted murderer on the FBI's "Most Wanted Terrorists" list. This official story is simple, stark, and designed to end all discussion.

But this narrative is a weapon. The relentless pursuit of Assata Shakur was never about a single crime; it was a war against a powerful idea. To understand her true legacy, we must look beyond the bounty and examine the world of capitalist exploitation and state-sponsored terror that made her a revolutionary.

Here are 5 revolutionary truths her story reveals.

1. The Black Panther Party Was About Community Survival

The state could not attack what the Black Panther Party (BPP) actually was—a revolutionary community service organization—so it manufactured a lie. The media painted them as a violent gang to justify a war of annihilation.

The reality was starkly different. Long before the government acted, the Panthers were serving the people:

  • Free Breakfast for Children Programs: Ensuring kids didn't go to school hungry.
  • Liberation Schools and Free Health Clinics: Providing education and medical care where the state refused.
  • Community Defense against Police Brutality: Championing the right to self-defense.

The Panthers' legal guns were framed as illegal; their Blackness was treated as the crime. This community organizing was the true threat to the capitalist state because it proved a socialist alternative was possible.

“We were certainly convinced that people who are oppressed... had the right to liberate themselves by whatever means they deemed necessary... We can't just be permanent victims.”
— Assata Shakur

2. COINTELPRO: The U.S. Government's Secret War on Black Liberation

The attack on the Black liberation movement went far beyond biased headlines. The FBI waged a secret, illegal war under COINTELPRO (Counter-Intelligence Program).

Its mission was to "expose, disrupt, misdirect, discredit, or otherwise neutralize" political groups like the Black Panther Party. The FBI's tactics were insidious:

  • Using psychological warfare and anonymous letters to create internal conflict.
  • Employing informants to spread disinformation.
  • Framing activists and orchestrating violent police clashes.

It was in this context that the "terrorist" label was applied to Assata Shakur. The FBI even launched "CHESROB," a specific operation to frame her for "virtually every bank robbery or violent crime involving a black woman on the East Coast." Her identity was not just monitored; it was weaponized by the state.

3. A "Legal Lynching": The Flaws in Her Conviction

In 1977, Assata Shakur was convicted of murder in what many condemned as a political prosecution. The trial was a two-pronged attack on justice itself.

Mugshot of Assata Shakur, April 1971
Mugshot of Assata Shakur, April 1971
This work is in the public domain in the United States

Suppressed Physical Evidence:

  • Medical experts testified that her wounds made it "anatomically impossible" for her to have fired a gun.
  • Forensic analysis found no gunpowder residue on her hands.

A Manufactured, Biased Jury:

  • The trial was moved to an overwhelmingly white county.
  • The jury was all-white, with five of the fifteen jurors having personal ties to State Troopers.

Faced with this system, a fair trial was impossible.

“I am a 20th-century escaped slave. Because the legal system in the United States is vicious, racist, and unjust.”
— Assata Shakur

4. Imperial Hypocrisy: The U.S. Harbors Its Own Terrorists

The U.S.'s moral outrage is exposed by its glaring double standard. While hunting Assata Shakur for decades, it provided safe haven for known anti-Castro terrorists.

Luis Posada Carriles and Orlando Bosch were CIA-funded exiles who masterminded the 1976 bombing of Cubana Flight 455, killing 73 civilians. Despite the evidence:

  • The U.S. refused to extradite them.
  • They lived freely in Florida, with Bosch receiving a pardon from President George H.W. Bush.

This contrast reveals the political function of the word "terrorist." Violence against U.S. interests is terrorism; violence in service of U.S. imperialism is protected.

5. Her Real Crime: An Unshakeable Socialist Vision

Ultimately, Assata Shakur was hunted not for a crime, but for her unwavering socialist vision. She understood that racial and class oppression were pillars of a global capitalist system.

She rejected appeals to the oppressor's morality, arguing for revolutionary change.

“Nobody in the world, nobody in history, has ever gotten their freedom by appealing to the moral sense of the people who are oppressing them.”
— Assata Shakur

Her escape to socialist Cuba was a profound act of political solidarity. It was a living testament that another world is possible—a connection the U.S. empire could never tolerate.

Conclusion: The Legacy Beyond the Mugshot

The official story of Assata Shakur is one of crime. The real story is one of resistance and revolution. Her life teaches us about state repression, imperial hypocrisy, and the enduring power of an idea.

Her legacy is not a mugshot on a government wall; it is a call to action for all who fight for a just world.

This article presents a political perspective and should be read as analysis and commentary.
It is our duty to fight for our freedom.
It is our duty to win.
We must love each other and support each other.
We have nothing to lose but our chains.

Further Reading: If you're interested in the history of resistance, check out our post on The History of Fascism in the United States.

What are your thoughts on Assata Shakur's legacy and the U.S. government's pursuit of her? Share your reflections in the comments below.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What's Really Happening in Portland? Trump Threatens Military Crackdown as ICE Faces Permit Revocation

What's Really Happening in Portland? Trump Threatens Military Crackdown as ICE Faces Permit Revocation Federal troop deployment threatens Portland as the city moves to hold ICE accountable for permit violations, creating a dangerous spectacle of political theater. PORTLAND, OR – On September 27th, Donald Trump declared on Truth Social that he was directing "all necessary Troops to protect War ravaged Portland," framing the city as a battlefield against "Antifa, and other domestic terrorists" . This announcement was followed by a Defense Department memo placing 200 members of the Oregon National Guard under federal control for up to 60 days, a move state leaders are challenging in court . Governor Tina Kotek, who had refused to mobilize the Guard herself, stated, "Oregon is our home — not a military target" . The reality on the ground contradicts the administration's narrative. Mayor Keith Wilson asserted that "the number of neces...

What Is a Tankie—and Why You Don’t Want to Be One

What Is a Tankie—and Why You Don’t Want to Be One On authoritarianism, anti-imperialism, and the betrayal of socialist principles In leftist discourse, few terms carry as much heat as “tankie.” It’s hurled in online arguments, whispered in organizing meetings, and increasingly invoked to describe a certain strain of pro-authoritarian “leftism” that defends dictators under the banner of anti-imperialism. But the term isn’t just internet slang. It has a precise historical origin—and a political meaning that every socialist should understand. “Maximum Tankie” by Red & Black Salamander (9mmballpoint.blogspot.com). Used under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. The Origin of the Term The word “tankie” emerged in 1956, when Soviet tanks rolled into Budapest to crush the Hungarian Revolution—a popular uprising of workers and students demanding democratic socialism. Members of the Communist Party of Great Britain who defended this violent suppression were derisively ...

The Emperor’s New Magnets

The Emperor’s New Magnets Trump’s wet physics and the theater of power Aboard the USS George Washington this week, Donald Trump—rambling incoherently—revived a claim he first made at an Iowa rally in January 2024: that water disables magnets. “Give me a glass of water,” he said then, “drop it on the magnets—that’s the end of the magnets.” Now, he’s using that same myth to argue that U.S. aircraft carriers should abandon electromagnetic catapults and elevators in favor of steam and hydraulics. Never mind that the Navy’s Electromagnetic Aircraft Launch System (EMALS) operates flawlessly in rain, salt spray, and full oceanic conditions. Never mind that magnets do not stop working when wet —a fact confirmed by centuries of physics and every refrigerator on Earth. This isn’t a gaffe. It’s a worldview. Desi Lydic eviscerates Trump’s “wet magnets” claim on The Daily Show (November 2025). “Do You F–k With Magnets?” On Tuesday’s Daily Show , hos...